Scenario Awareness and
Decision Making within a Warning
Advanced Alert Operations Study course
IC Primary 2
Lesson 3: Staff SA
Warning Decision Teaching Branch
Lesson 3 can focus on the Situation Awareness (SA) of groups. The " teamsвЂќ through this lesson aren't limited to the forecast workplace staff. For example , another group would be the whole group composed by the forecast office, the media, and emergency managers, who are part of the caution process.
Lesson a few: Team SOCIAL FEAR
вЂў Identify factors that could impact receiving
and maintaining team SOCIAL FEAR.
" When ever in danger, when ever in doubt, operate in groups,
scream and shoutвЂќ
The training Objective pertaining to Lesson several applies to elements that affect getting and maintaining group SA. The training Objectives will probably be tested as you take the online exam for IC Core 2 .
Lesson a few: Team SA
1 . Employing specific info examples, recognize the
three levels of SOCIAL FEAR and how they can be
contributing to the warning decisions,
a) WES simulations, and
b) Alert events.
installment payments on your As part of post-event analysis, decide
the role that SOCIAL FEAR (good or perhaps bad) on the
three levels played inside the warning
decisions that were made.
The Performance Objectives pertaining to Lesson 3 apply within this course along with after conclusion. Though they are really not examined formally, queries related to these types of Performance Targets will be presented during the training course simulations. Growing SA inside the " domainвЂќ of the caution environment is actually a skill that evolves after some time and is a crucial asset to make sound caution decisions.
Apollo 13 and Team SA
Will Robinson! вЂќ
The Apollo 13 mission is definitely an interesting sort of a change in team SA. This kind of large group of controllers had to build their SOCIAL FEAR sufficiently to shift the goal via mission achievement to getting the astronauts backside alive. Imagine the reluctance to abandon the mission, although lengthy amount of resistance would have caused delays that may have eliminated the return of the astronauts.
A Shared Understanding
Who's in control
What are each of
these people carrying out?
Who has the
Did the right person
notice that statement?
This photo was used at a forecast business office during a significant warning function. The arrows depict each of the potential interactions among team members. There are five people employed in this one location and others functioning elsewhere. The potential for communications mayhem is very rich in this environment.
Are Team Decisions Inherently
Different views can paralyze a team
Teams may suffer by a collective error
Connection of information between team
users may be flawed
вЂў Status differences may well have an impact
вЂў Cultural differences may may play a role
Team SA has its own problems. Team decisions are not automatically better. There are a variety of points that can derail team SA, such as lack of ability to resolve disputes, poor connection, status and cultural distinctions.
Team SA Explanation
" The active building of a situation partly shared
and partly distributed between two or more brokers,
from which one can possibly anticipate essential states in the
Salas ain al 95
near future. вЂќ
вЂў Crew SA may be the result of each individual's SOCIAL FEAR
вЂў In the event one individual manages to lose SA, it could affect regarding
" 40% of reported incidents in the ASRS
info base occurred when only one crew
member had a problem with SA. вЂќ
The meaning of staff SA addresses the construction of SA for every single individual, with information distributed among team members, building staff SA. The quote by ASRS demonstrates the impact is definitely significant when ever only one member of a crew loses their particular SA. ASRS is the Modern aviation Safety Credit reporting System, an internet site provided by NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) where pilots and staff members can easily report incidents anonymously. This database is likewise used by human factors...